Jesus in the Qur’an

quranic verses about jesus“The Qur’an gives a greater number of honourable titles to Jesus than to any other figure of the past.  He is a ‘sign’, a ‘mercy’, a ‘witness’ and an ‘example’.  He is called by his proper name Jesus, by the titles Messiah (Christ) and Son of Mary, and by the names Messenger, Prophet, Servant, Word and Spirit of God.” [i]

The Qur’an shows Jesus as a prophet, and “just as in the New Testament John the Baptist is Jesus’ precursor, so in the Qur’an Jesus is the precursor — and highly encouraging example — for Muhammad.  To be sure, the Qur’an says that Jesus (in contrast to the Prophet) was directly fashioned by God”. [ii]  “The Qur’an leaves no doubt about the fact that Jesus preached the truth; but the language that it has him speak is altogether different from that of the gospels.” [iii] The story of the birth of Jesus in the Qur’an seems to draw from the stories found in the gospels.  The Qur’an refers to Jesus as the Son of Mary. “Mary, the mother of Jesus, is the only woman who is called by her proper name in the Qur’an. Other women are mentioned but not named.” [iv]  The Qur’an includes stories of the Immaculate Conception, the Presentation in the Temple, the Annunciation and the Virgin Birth. [v]  Mary is revered as the mother of Jesus.      

                        And when the angels said,

                        Mary, God has chosen

                        thee, and purified

                        thee, He has chosen

                        thee, above all women.

                        Mary, be obedient to

                        thy Lord, prostrating

                        and bowing before Him

                        whose name is Messiah,

                        Jesus, son of Mary;

                        high honoured shall he be

                        in this world and the next,

                        near stationed to God.

                        He shall speak to men

                        in the cradle, and of age

                        and righteous he shall be  (Surah 3:37-41)

The story of the annunciation and birth is detailed further in Surah 19 and Surah 3.  Mary is visited by an angel who tells her that the Lord will make her a “sign” and she will bear a son who will be a great prophet.  The story resembles those told in the gospels of Luke and Matthew and includes elements found in the early apocryphal writings (The Gospel of Thomas and the Gospel of the Childhood in Arabic).  There is however, an emphasis in Surah 112, that denies that God is the father of the child.  God is responsible for the birth, but in the same way as he is responsible for the creation of Adam.

When Mary presents her child to her family, the baby silences any reproaches toward Mary by speaking directly to them, “Lo, I am God’s servant: God has given me the Book, and made me a prophet.  Blessed has he made me.” (Surah 19:16-33)

The Qur’an depicts Jesus as a prophet of God:

                        And when Jesus came with the

                        clear signs he said, ‘I have

                        come to you with wisdom, and

                        that I may make clear to you

                        some of that whereon you are

                        at variance; so fear you God (Surah 43:63-4)

The signs of Jesus’ prophecy were the miracles that he preformed.  Although Muhammad’s only miracle was the Qur’an itself.  The Qur’an attributes many miracles to Jesus, beginning with the miracle of Jesus speaking from the cradle (Surah 19:30; 3:41).  As in the apocryphal Gospel of Thomas, the Qur’an includes the story of the young Jesus breathing life into clay birds (Surah 3:42).  The Qur’an attributes miracles of healing to Jesus who cures a man, blind from birth and a leper (Surah 4:110), and states that Jesus raised the dead (Surah 3:43).  In the Qur’an, Jesus brings down a great table from heaven on which is a meal (Surah 4:115).  This story has been compared to the gospel accounts of the Last Supper, the miracle of the loaves and fishes as well as Peter’s vision in Acts.

 According to the Qur’an, Jesus came to confirm the Torah:

                         Likewise confirming the

                        truth of the Torah that

                        is before me, and to make

                        lawful to you certain

                        things that before were

                        forbidden unto you (Surah 3:43)

 The Qur’an does not go into detail about the teaching of Jesus but seems to refer to the Gospel or “Injil” as confirming the Torah, through which God entered into a covenant with Abraham.  Jesus indicates in the Qur’an, that while confirming the Torah he is also expanding upon it:

                        I have come to you with

                        a sign from your Lord;

                        so fear you God, and

                        obey you me.  Surely

                        God is my Lord and

                        your Lord; so serve Him.

                        This is a straight path. (Surah 3:44)

The Qur’an does refer to Jesus as “Messiah”, but the meaning of this word must be understood not in it Christian translation as “Christos” or Saviour, but in its original Jewish context of an anointed one.  “So Jesus was one whose touch purified from faults, being himself provided with the protection of the divine blessing anointed with the blessed oil with which former prophets were anointed.  Jesus himself anointed the needy, healing the blind, laying hands on the sick, and using oil for blessing.” [vi]  The Qur’an clearly states that “the Messiah, son of Mary, is nothing but a messenger” (Surah 4:79), and as such “The Messiah will not disdain to be a servant of God” (Surah 4:170).  This subordination of Jesus to the supreme God is important in the Qur’anic references to Jesus as “Word”.  Jesus came into being because God willed him to be (Surah 3:522-59).  In the Qur’anic annunciation the Angel announces “good tidings of a Word from Him” (Surah 3:40). Unlike the Word or Logos of the Gospel of John, the Word in the Qur’an is not equal to God but exists because God willed it to exist.

As God’s messenger Jesus announced the coming of Muhammad:               

                        And when Jesus son of

                        Mary said, ‘Children of

                        Israel, I am indeed the

                        Messenger of God to you,

                        confirming the Torah

                        that is before me, and

                        giving good tidings of

                        a Messenger who shall

                        come after me whose

                        name shall be Ahmed. (Surah 61:6)

Although this resembles Jesus’ promise of the Paraclete in the Gospel of John, Islam asserts that the name of Ahmed is a direct reference to Muhammad.  Various revisions to the text suggest alternate readings, such as the rendering of “bearing the name Ahmed” as “god will put a seal on the prophets” [vii] or reading the word Ahmed not as a proper name but as an adjective meaning worthy of praise. [viii] Regardless of this debate, Islamic tradition sees Jesus as the Prophet who foretold the coming of the Seal of the Prophets, Muhammad.

Concerning the death of Jesus, the Qur’an maintains that Jesus did not die on the Cross but was raised to heaven by God.  The Qur’an states that the Jews did not kill Jesus but a likeness that had been shown to them (Surah 4:156).  Since Jesus did not die on the cross but was raised up to heaven by God (Surah 4:155-7), Islamic tradition has suggested many possibilities regarding his return or second coming.  Islamic tradition  holds that Jesus will return and reign as a just king and that the second coming will be a sign that the end of this world is near.  However this is not found in the Qur’an.

The Qur’an describes Jesus as being close to God, but cautions against the Christian Trinitarian belief in Jesus as a manifestation of God.  The Christian concept of the Triune God was anathema to the strongly monotheistic Muslims.  The Qur’an speaks directly to Christians when it warns them against seeing Jesus as more than just a prophet:

                        People of the Book, go not beyond the bounds

                        in your religion, and say not as to God

                        but the truth.  The Messiah, Jesus son of Mary,

                        was only the Messenger of God, and His Word

                        that He committed to Mary, and a Spirit from

                        Him.  So believe in God and His Messengers,

                        and say not, ‘Three’.  Refrain; better is it

                        for you.  God is only One God.  Glory be

                        to Him — that He should have a son! (Surah 4:169)

Early Christianity had problems in defining their orthodox position on the Trinity and it is not difficult to see how the worship of a Triune God could have appeared as worshipping three gods.  Even today the concept of the Trinity is difficult for the average Christian to understand or explain.  The Qur’an was written against a background of Arabian polytheism and Muslims struggled to maintain the supremacy of Allah against this backdrop and the concept of the Trinity was too easily confused with the worship of three gods.  The Qur’an described Jesus as a creature created by the will of God, to be honoured as a prophet but not worshipped as God.

According to the Qur’an God bestowed “the Book” upon Jesus who passed its messages on to the Christians.  Christians are referred to as fellow People of the Book and, “There is no suggestion in the Qur’an that the Gospel given to Jesus was different from the canonical Gospels held by Christians.” [ix]  The Qur’an does speak of the Gospel in the possession of the Christians (Surah 7:156-7) and advises the Christians to follow the messenger spoken of in it. [x]

Christians, or followers of Jesus are referred to in the Qur’an as Nassara.  The term is thought to have originated from the word Nazarene or Nazareth.  The Qur’an says that “all who truly believe in God, Jews, Christians and others will be rewarded on the Last Day.”  [xi]

            Those who have believed, those who have judaised,

            the Nassara and  the Sabi’in, whoever has believed in God and

            the Last Day, and has acted uprightly, have their reward                 

            with their Lord; fear rests not upon them, nor do they

            grieve. (Surah 2:59-62)

The Qur’an address the problem of disputes among the various People of the Book:

            The Jews say, “The Christians stand not on anything”;

            the Christians say, “The Jews stand not on anything”;

            yet they recite the Book.  So too the ignorant

            say the like of them.  God shall decide between them

            on the Day of Resurrection touching their differences

            (Surah 2:105-7)

The exact nature of the Jewish and Christian communities in and around Arabia at the time of Muhammad is not known.  It is clear however that much of Muhammad’s revelation was influenced by these communities.  We do know that various Christian sects were present in the area and Muhammad’s encounter with them explains many of the Qur’anic warnings to Christians concerning what the Church now sees to be heretical concepts about the nature of the Trinity, the veneration of Mary, and the worship of saints and relics.  “The Qur’an denies Christian heresies of Adoption, Patripassionism, and Mariolarty.” [xii]

 The Qur’an differentiates between the various types of Christians explaining that:

             “The Messiah is the Son of God”

            That is the utterance of their mouths, conforming

            with the unbelievers before them.  God assail them!

            How they are perverted!

            They have taken their rabbis and their monks as lords.

            (Surah 9:30)

The Qur’an seems to call Christians back to the original Gospel message, warning against the perverted teachings of theologians and yet it also recognizes that there are among them priests and monks, who are “nearest in love to those who have believed” (Surah 5:85)

The history of tension and violence between Christians and Muslims is a long one.  More often than not the differences between the off-spring of Judaism have prevented each from exploring the Jesus of the Qur’an.  Perhaps a closer adherence to the words of their founders would help to ease current world tensions.  The Qur’an admonishes Muslims to:

                         Dispute not with the people of the Book

                        save in the fairer manner, except for

                        those of them that do wrong; and say

                        We believe in what has been sent down to you;

                        our God and your God is One, and to Him

                        we have surrendered. (Surah 29:45)

 The Qur’an explains that:

                        Had God so willed, he would have made you

                        one community but (he hath not done so) in

                        order that he might try you in regard to

                        what has come to you; so strive to be

                        foremost in what is good. (Surah 5:53)          

The Christian theologian Hans Kung has written that:  “If contemporary Christians and Muslims want to understand each other better, they have to go back to their origins (and apply a discriminating critique to later developments).  At our origins, all of us — Jews, Christians, and Muslims — are closer to one another.” [xiii]  If this is true then perhaps through careful exploration of the scriptures the “People of the Book” can together, gain a better understanding of one another and perhaps begin to solve some of the political problems that plague the globe.

([i].     Geoffrey Parrinder, Jesus in the Qur’an (London: Sheldon Press,1965), page 15.[ii].    Hans Kung, Christianity and the World Religions, (New York: Doubleday, 1985), page 110. [iii].   Parrinder, page 60. [iv].    Parrinder.  page 98. [v].     Anawati.  page 81. [vi].    Parrinder, page 31.[vii].   Parrinder, page 96. [viii].   Parrinder, page 99. [ix].    Parrinder, page 145. [x].     Parrinder, page 145. [xi].    Parrinder, page 153. [xii].   Parrinder,  page 137. [xiii].   Kung, page 122) 

Islam

IslamAs one who seeks to encounter the Divine by following Christ, I am often astounded and saddened by the ways in which many of my sisters and brothers misunderstand those who  seek God by following the teachings of Islam. I offer this PBS documentary series as a window into the ways of our Islamic sisters and brothers. 

Islam: Empire of Faith

Beloved, Lover and Love

waters 4Baptism of Jesus Sermon

Sunday January 13, 2013

Listen to the sermon here

The Bat Qol – The Daughter of A Sound – The Still Small Voice

BAT QOL pastordawnThis morning our gospel text echo’s the Bat Qol which speaks at Jesus’ baptism as the heavens are torn open. The hebrew “bat qol” is often translated as “the still small voice” but when translated literally it is the “daughter of a sound”. The voice of God speaks to declare love. May you hear yourself named and called by that voice, for you are the daughters and sons of God, beloved of God!

A little music to tune your ears with. Enjoy you beloved daughters and sons of God! Then be the lovers you are created to be.

Baptism of Jesus

baptism jesusJoin us tomorrow as we celebrate the Baptism of Jesus by affirming our own baptisms. Our worship will be followed by an Agape Meal – Everyone is welcome!

See you at 10:45am at Holy Cross Lutheran Church

Our Hymn of the Day will be Marty Haugen’s Song Over the Waters

Living a Life that Matters – Rabbi Harold Kushner

waveAllen Greg interviews Rabbi Harold Kushner on the twentieth anniversary of his book When Bad Things Happen to Good People on the subject of his new book Living a Life that Matters. I received my first copy of When Bad Things Happen to Good people shortly after it was first published. It is a gift I will always be grateful for. It is a gift that has served me well in my ministry. It is a book I have given as a gift to many people. Harold Kushner is a gift and over the years I have eagerly read each of his many books as they have been published. I read them over and over again, discovering something new each time. 

A Case for God – Brian McLaren

God who?Speaking at St. Paul’s (Nov.2012), Brian McLaren reflects on A New Kind of Christianity as he makes his own “case for God”. 

The Case for God – Karen Armstrong

who is God2Karen Armstrong provides a stunningly articulate exploration of our inability to define God. Armstrong’s expansive knowledge of the history of humanity’s attempts to to express the inexpressible is astounding. Speaking at St. Paul’s in London (Oct.2012), Armstrong provides an overview of her book The Case for God. Armstrong packs so much of her wealth of knowledge into lecture that I felt like I was hearing a review of my entire under-graduate degree in Religion. Her’s is a vital review for those of us who spend our days preaching and teaching, if only to render us more humble in our proclamations about the divine reality we call God. Armstrong’s overview is also a splendid introduction for those seeking a deeper understanding some of the riches that have been stored up by seekers who have gone before us. Enjoy!!!

How Did She Who Has Breasts Become God Almighty?

GOD’s Radical Mastectomy

divine feminine 3Recently, I found myself in conversation with a young woman who insisted that inclusive language for God is nothing more than political correctness that has been imposed upon the church by feminists. She insisted that because women have now achieved equality with men, the need for inclusive language for God has served its purpose and need no longer be of concern to worship leaders. I am grateful that my age afforded me the maturity not to explode on this young woman who can well afford her opinion as a direct result of some of the language battles that I and my contemporaries struggled to overcome while she was but knee high to a grasshopper. Our conversation has stuck with me and caused me to review some things that I wrote long ago about the impact our language has not only on our images of the Divine but on the way we live together in community. What follows is a portion of a piece I wrote about the disappearance of the Breasted One as a name for God.

“We believe in one God, the Father the Almighty… We believe in one Lord, Jesus Christ, the only Son of God, eternally begotten of the Father…  We believe in the Holy Spirit, the Lord, the giver of life, who proceeds from the Father and the Son.  With the Father and the Son he is worshipped and glorified.  He has spoken through the prophets.[1]  In this God:  “We believe” and “His kingdom will have no end!”  God in three persons: Father, Son and Holy Spirit, our blessed Trinity.  As we proclaim our faith in the words of the Nicene, Apostles’, or (heaven forbid) the Athanasian creeds we proclaim a particular image of the Triune God.  For generations,  a majority of Christians have assumed all three persons in this Trinity are male.  Until recently this assumption has resulted in the exclusive use of male images, symbols and pronouns to represent the Triune God which Christians worship.  God has been declared to be male.  This is not an easy declaration to make.  In order to make such a declaration, many of God’s attributes which are revealed in the biblical accounts have been eradicated from the Christian tradition. 

     Long before the Christian church began to formulate its exclusively male image of the triune God, the Hebrew people used several words to refer to God.  The earliest of these words is “El” which is the generic Semitic word for a god.   

to read the more click here

Talking Sense – John Dominic Crossan

walk humblyMy favourite New Testament scholar, Dom Crossan responds to the question “Is God violent.” In a week were more than a few fanatics have been given airtime to call for more weapons in the hands of more people, I find Dom’s gentle responses reassuring. If only we could convince those who would use texts deemed “sacred” to read them before they draw their own conclusions about what these texts say. If only we could begin to take these texts seriously instead of literally!

The New Violence and Its Unexpected Victims – Joan Chittister

divine feminine 2Think feminism is passé, think again. Speaking at the Westminster Town Hall Forum in November 2012, Sister Joan Chittister exposes the scandalous realities in the lives of so many women in the world.  The situations in the lives of woman that Sister Joan describes are shocking, but the notion that so many young women suffer from the delusion that the need for feminism has passed is positively frightening. 

The Baptism of Jesus and The Missing Verses in the Lectionary Gospel Text

JB in prisonWhile musing on the readings for this coming Sunday, I came across these notes that I made the last time these readings came up – Baptism of Jesus 2010. I offer them to my preaching colleagues in the hope that we might move beyond the story as it has been read during worship so that we might challenge old assumptions and images of the Divine.

According to the Revised Common Lectionary, the appointed Gospel reading for this Sunday when the church celebrates the Baptism of Jesus is Luke: 3:15-17, 21-22. But what about the missing verses 18-20?

Whenever the RCL leaves verses out of an appointed reading, I can’t help wondering what they are afraid of. Could the missing verses contain some hidden information that might threaten some established Christian doctrine? 

Most of us have heard this story of Jesus baptism so many times that we think we know it all. John the Baptist, proclaimed that the Messiah was coming and that the children of God, needed to repent and be baptized. This baptism of repentance was popular among Jesus’ Jewish contemporaries but troublesome to the Roman Empire. As his first public act Jesus went down to the Jordan River and even though John protested that he was unworthy to baptize Jesus, Jesus submitted to John’s baptism of repentance.

That’s how so many people learned the story and the way most people remember it. That is after all pretty much what the what the Gospel according to Luke actually says provided you leave out verses 18 to 20.  

         Why don’t we read those verses during our worship on the Sunday that celebrates Jesus baptism? What’s in those verses that caused the folks who decided what is read in church on a Sunday morning shouldn’t include those particular verses?

Well if you consult the lectionary commentaries most of them will tell you that these verses are left out so as not to confuse the people in the pews. These verses are left out to protect worshippers. The so-called “experts” believe that if these verses were read worshippers might become confused and their childhood memories of this story would be challenged.

So here is the story as it appears in print:

“As the people were filled with expectation, and all were questioning in their hearts concerning John, whether he might be the Messiah, John answered all of them by saying, “I baptize you with water; but one who is more powerful than I is coming, the thong of whose sandals I am not worthy to untie. He will baptize you with the Holy Spirit and fire. With a winnowing fork in hand, he will clear the threshing floor and gather the wheat into his granary, burning the chaff with unquenchable fire.”

       Note well the missing verses:

“But Herod the ruler, whom John rebuked because of his wickedness, including his relationship with his sister-in-law, Herodias—committed another crime by throwing John into prison.”

Those are the two missing verses. The two verses that the experts decided should not be read this morning lest they confuse you.    Herod throws John the Baptist into prison, but we leave that out and without a buy your leave, we read on:

“Now when all the people were baptized, and when Jesus also had been baptized and was praying, the heaven was opened, and the Holy Spirit descended upon Jesus in bodily form like a dove.  And a voice came from heaven,  “You are my Son, the Beloved; with you I AM well pleased.”

If John was thrown into prison when Jesus went down to the Jordan to be baptized, who baptized Jesus?  Now you could say, as many interpreters have said, that the order is not significant and that the writer of the Gospel of Luke didn’t really mean to say that John was already in prison when Jesus was baptized. But if that’s true, then how can we put any faith in the writer’s ability to get the order correct in the other stories he writes about the life of Jesus?

HMMM, as Luther would say, “What does this mean?” Could it be that we don’t know everything about this story? Could it be that there’s more to learn? Could it be that the writer is trying to say something that we’ve failed to consider in the past? Is the writer trying to distance Jesus from the teachings of John? Could it be that the writer of the Gospel is trying to let us know that the Baptism of Repentance practiced by John is different than Jesus’ actual baptism?

John proclaimed that the Messiah will baptize with fire. “The Messiah will carry a winnowing fork in his hand, to clear his threshing floor and to gather the wheat into his granary, but the chaff he will burn with unquenchable fire.” As soon as we hear this, we begin to wonder if we are wheat or chaff and being raised as good Christians we know that we are unworthy and we can almost feel the unquenchable fire singeing at our heels. But according to the writer of Luke, Herod tosses John into prison and we don’t hear from him again until just before his head is lopped off and served up on a silver platter and John sends his disciples to inquire as to whether or not Jesus is the hoped for Messiah. With John in prison the writer of the Gospel according to Luke, has Jesus go down to the Jordan for a different kind of baptism: Not a baptism for the repentance of sin, but a baptism in which God claims Jesus as his beloved son, in whom God is well pleased.

The best kinds of parents that I know, don’t keep their children in a state of constant fear and guilt. They don’t use the treat of punishment as a way to encourage their children to grow. The best kinds of parents encourage their children to grow by loving, nurturing and encouraging them. Really good parents know the importance of empowering their children.

If you read this story carefully you can almost hear the Creator of all that is and all that ever shall be beaming with pride as he says, “That’s my boy! My beautiful child!  Just look at him! Isn’t he marvelous!  I get such a kick out of him.  I could watch him for hours!  I’m so very pleased with him!” No wonder the skies opened up and the Holy Spirit descended on him! What parent wouldn’t empower a child that pleased them so?

If we insist on anthropomorphizing the Creator of all that is and all that ever shall be, then shouldn’t we at least create an image of God that reflects the best in us? Forget the image of God as an abusive parent and begin to see God as the best parent we know how to be. That image will still fail to reflect all that God is, but surely it will give us a better glimpse of some of what God is. And then we can begin to see that like any good parent our God is a God who empowers us. Then we can begin to see that in our baptism the power of the Holy Spirit was given to us. That we too are children of God, and that God delights in us. Maybe then we can begin to claim our inheritance as children of God. Maybe we will see that the power of forgiveness has been given to us and that mercy is ours to bestow. And empowered by the Spirit God we can grow into all that God created us to be.

      

 

You are the Light of the World – Epiphany Sermon

epiphanyListen to the Epiphany sermon here

The text of the “Our Greatest Fear” Williamson quote is here

A little something from Odetta for after the sermon! Enjoy!

Radical Theology and Piracy

female pirateFor those of you who enjoyed Kester Brewin’s playful, pirate theological take on the Prodigal this conversation will help you walk off the plank and into the sea of “radical theology. Kester Brewin, Peter Rollins, and Barry Taylor engage in conversation at Fuller Theological Seminary explore what they and others in the emergent church are calling “radical theology”.  Radical theology seeks to move beyond current concerns about how we do church or express our faith in the 21st century to a movement that seeks to reject traditional notions of “God”.    

Prodigal Pirate Tragedy?

prodigal childKester Brewin certainly has a different take on the story of the prodigal! Pirate Theology is not a homiletical method that I’ve ever employed. But then pirates tend to work for themselves. Brewin’s playful pirate theology encourages us to leave our places of comfort in order to view a familiar story as a tragedy in order to grasp what he calls “radical theology” in which we take responsibility for who we are rather than defer to “the Big Other”.

Brewin is a founding member of Vaux-London, a collective of artists and faithful urban dwellers that served as an early model of fresh expressions of church in the UK.

Kester teaches Mathematics in London and works as a consultant for the BBC, as well as writing for the national educational press. He is also an acclaimed poet and has been described by Brian McLaren as ‘one of the leading public theologians for a new generation of thoughtful Christians.’ 

Embracing Mystery and Unknowing – Peter Rollins

Peter RollinsPeter Rollins uses contradictions to communicate what he calls the “radical” reality of Christian theology which he believes enables us to embrace and celebrate our brokenness and thereby move toward healthy community. “The church is not designed to give you things…it helps you experience the depth, the sacredness and the beauty of what you already have.”

This interview was recorded by ChurchNext on Dec. 14, 2012

Epiphany: Evolution is Shedding New Light on Our Lives – Joan Chittister

sad EckhartThanks to science and all we have learned about creation, we are beginning to develop new images of the ultimate reality we call God. New images of God challenge the patriarchal misogyny of religious traditions. When it comes to re-imagining the faith, Sister Joan Chittister paints a picture of God as One Who Summons from among us – Emmanuel. The Summoning One calls and encourages us toward a world of equals. “Evolution is shedding new light on our lives.”

The Idolatry of God – Peter Rollins

Peter Rollins new book The Idolatry of God: Breaking the Addiction to Certainty and Satisfaction has just been released in North America. I didn’t wait for this release, I had a copy shipped out from the UK last month. So, I can whole-heartedly recommend it!  I’ll post a full review soon.  Peter Rollins will be our guest at Holy Cross in Newmarket for the weekend of April 12-14: tickets will go on sale in a couple of weeks–so stay tuned.

In the meantime, enjoy the video of Pete talking about his new book.  

The Greatest Birth Story Ever?

WOMAN DOVE

 

Fourth Sunday of Advent

December 23, 2012

Listen to the sermon here

Greatest Birth Story Ever?